Networking, a Soft Science? Only to College Professors!
August 6, 2008 by Ivan Misner
Filed under Uncategorized
Recently, I had lunch with the President of a Southern California University along with his Dean for the School of Business. We spoke about many things but, he specifically wondered what I thought the school could be doing better to teach students graduating from his University. My answer was easy – “start teaching courses on networking, social capital and/or emotional intelligence.â€
He asked me “why?â€Â I told him that if you ask the average business person or entrepreneur what one of the most important ways to build their business is, they will almost always tell you “networking or word of mouth. So, if networking is so important, why aren’t we teaching it? I told him that “social capital (which is the study of resources developed through personal and professional relationships) and emotional intelligence (sometimes called EQ for emotional quotient) are key factors to the successful interaction of people with one another. I suggested that often people may get hired because of their “IQ†but they will get promoted because of their “EQ. All of these subjects have a strong influence on someone’s success and there is a wealth of research being developed in each of those areas.
The President looked to his Dean for the School of Business and asked him what he thought. The Dean looked me squarely in the eyes and said, “my professors would never teach that material here! I asked him “why†and he said, “it’s all soft science.â€
Soft science! Teaching people how to interact with people in an effective way is “soft science! I should not have been surprised. I’ve run into this many times before with college professors in the past. I was just amazed that this progressive university would take such a position.
We give people bachelor’s degrees in marketing, business, and even entrepreneurship, but we teach them hardly anything about the one subject that virtually every entrepreneur says is critically important to their business – networking and social capital. Why don’t business schools teach this subject? I think it’s because most business schools are made up of professors who’ve NEVER owned a business in their life! Almost everything they’ve learned about running a business they’ve learned from books and consulting. Well, I’ve read a fair number of books, I was a consultant for many years, and I’ve run my own business for more than two decades. I can tell you first hand that if you haven’t actually owned a business, you have a handicap in teaching a course involving entrepreneurship.
Can you imagine a law course taught by someone who’s not an attorney, or an accounting course taught by anyone without direct accounting experience? Yet we put business professors in colleges to teach courses related to marketing and entrepreneurship with little or no first hand experience in the field. Is it any wonder then that a subject that is so critically important to business people would be so completely missed by business schools? Of course not. Networking and social capital courses aren’t taught in business schools because most business professors aren’t practitioners. They don’t really understand the importance of this subject for entrepreneurs. Granted, there was little written in the field of networking and social capital twenty years ago (do a literature search – you’ll see), but that is not the case today. There are hundreds of articles and many books on various facets of the area. A thorough bibliography of many of these articles and books can be found in the back of The World’s Best Known Marketing Secret (Revised Edition).
Networking is a field that is finally being codified and structured. Business schools around the world need to wake up and start teaching this curriculum. Schools like any large institution are bureaucracies, so it is unlikely to happen quickly; however, for those schools with vision, foresight, and the ability to act swiftly (sort of the way business professors claim that “businesses should act), they will be positioning themselves as leaders in education by truly understanding and responding to the needs of today’s businesses. These schools will be on the cutting edge of business education so as to better serve their students while positioning themselves as a leading institution for entrepreneurs.
Word-of-mouth marketing works. Social capital is critically important. And networking is the mechanism to develop both. As more universities and colleges open their doors to professors who want to include this strategy with their marketing instruction, we are going to see a major shift in the business landscape. We will see emerging entrepreneurs who will be equipped with another strategy for success in business. We will see networking utilized at its fullest capacity and we will see business schools actually teaching a subject that the business practitioner says is important.
If that doesn’t happen, the private sector will once again step up to the plate and fill the gap for the lack of practical education provided by universities. Just look at sales training. Colleges totally miss the boat on this subject which has created an “after degree†market in sales training done by people like Brian Tracy (www.briantracyuniversity.com). I predict the same will happen for networking and referral marketing with organizations like the Referral Institute (www.referralinstitute.com).
By the way, at the end of the conversation during that lunch, I asked the Dean about courses on “leadershipâ€. I said, “how are courses on leadership any less of a ‘soft science’ than networkingâ€Â He didn’t have an answer. What a surprise.
I’d love to hear your thoughts!


Dr. Ivan Misner is the Founder & Chairman of BNI, the world’s largest business networking organization. BNI was founded in 1985. The organization now has over 5,000 chapters throughout every populated continent of the world. Last year alone, BNI generated 5.5 million referrals resulting in $2.2 billion dollars worth of business for its members.
Dr. Misner’s Ph.D. is from the University of Southern California. He has written ten books, including his New York Times Best sellers: Masters of Sales, Truth or Delusion? and Masters of Networking. He is a monthly columnist for Entrepreneur.com and is the Senior Partner for the Referral Institute – a referral training company with trainers around the world. In addition, he has taught business management and social capital courses at several universities throughout the United States and now sits on the Board of Trustees for the University of the Rockies.
Called the “Father of Modern Networking†by CNN and the “Networking Guru†by Entrepreneur magazine, Dr. Misner is considered to be one of the world’s leading experts on business networking and has been a keynote speaker for major corporations and associations throughout the world. He has been featured in the L.A. Times, Wall Street Journal, and New York. Times, as well as numerous TV and radio shows including CNN, CNBC, and the BBC in London.
Dr. Misner is the Founder of the BNI Misner Charitable Foundation and was recently named “Humanitarian of the Year†by a Southern California newspaper. He is married and lives with his wife Elisabeth and their three children in Claremont, CA. In his spare time!!! He is also an amateur magician and a black belt in karate. www.networking.entrepreneur.com
Ivan, great post. Research has shown that undergraduate and master’s level degrees are increasingly becoming a commodity (rather than a differentiator like it has been in years-past). An MBA just isn’t what it used to be.
You’re right that the literature on social capital and networking has vastly increased over the past 25 years. As you mention, there’s an amazing wealth of literature (both books and journals).
As for the argument that it’s a soft-science, Burt’s study on organizations in _Structural Holes_ provides a very compelling argument for teaching social capital. The people who had large networks experience fast promotion (short time in role before next promotion) and early promotion (young for their age).
So, if I’m a Dean wanting to train future leaders, I’d aggressively social capital theory. Oh, and those students who master social capital are likely to be successful leaders or entrepreneurs (and perhaps become active donors to the university). That’s a very compelling argument.
Social capital has attracted attention from sociologists (Coleman, Burt, Lin, Wellman, etc.) economists (Arrow, Stiglitz, and Ostrom), and political scientists (Putnam). Yet, after two decades, social capital still hasn’t reached “critical mass” within academia.
1) Social capital doesn’t fit cleanly within one academic field. Does it belong in IT (with network mapping); sociology; economics; political science . . . or somewhere else? (You could make an argument that it would even fit in the realm of Industrial-Organizational Psychology).
2) How do you define social capital (there are many definitions)? I’ve seen dozen of operational definitions, and they’re a confusing, contradictory mess.
I came to the field with a practitioner’s interest, and as I started reading, I found myself increasingly drawn into the academic research. There are some truly fascinating studies out there.